P1 Wimax
I got a brochure from this company selling WiMax in Klang Valley.
P1 Wimax, is it REALLY 42 times faster than dialup?
Ok, as we know, dialup is 56kbit/s, that is theoretically 8KB/s maximum. But lets put it at a real world 6KB/s performance. How does P1 WiMax stack up against good ol’ dialup!
Test A: Loading Google
Google is about 15KBytes of data. Simple maths would stipulate dial up can download it in under 3 seconds. Can P1 do it in 0.07seconds? Even to ping to google (malaysia) it would take about 0.07 seconds already, thats excluding downloading anything at all. I think we’re looking closer to 1.5 seconds. In which case, P1 is only 2 times faster than Dialup.
Test B: Loading CNN.com
CNN do not have local servers, but MIGHT have mirrors in Hong Kong. But lets say we’re connect to their server in the United States. And the site is 100 KB worth of images and media.
Dialup would take 17 seconds. Can P1 load it in 0.4 seconds as claimed by their brochure? Again, ping to USA would take 0.2 seconds, just to “find” the server.
Test C: MSN test
To send a message to a friend via MSN, it takes dialup exactly 1 second from pressing enter to appearing on a friend’s PC. Can P1 wimax make it 0.023 seconds? Faster than the speed of thought?
Test D: The 100 MB test
Downloading a 100MB file from a fast server. Ok, here, P1 might excel. My calculations show dialup will take about 5 hours. If P1 Wimax is able to deliver 2.4mbit full speed then it will only take 7 minutes. And yes, that makes it 42 times faster than dialup.
Ok, the speed tests are estimates but it does give a good idea on how fast the actual performance gains you will see.
In summary, P1 is not lying. They’re bloody fast.
But what does the number mean to you? Well, the above will really explain the TRUE picture.
On another note, I am designing and maintaining www.petroleo-services.com .. too bad my energi.my domain is not used. Any takers?
Related posts:
- 80 seconds. That’s what it takes for a … 80 seconds. That’s what it takes for a DSL modem to cold boot, until the time it is usable for downloading. 80 milliseconds (0.08sec). That’s how fast a packet of data from KL reaches Hong Kong (3500 km away)...
- TM Net is pretty good Its been a common problem since the birth of DSL in Malaysia. Everyone’s talking about it. Even kids in school says “TM Net sucks” before even knowing who they are! Imagine the internet as the Federal Highway during rush hour....
- Digi Telecommunication HSDPA (3.5G) One word: awsm. 1. Latency Tracing route to philipkhor.com [202.190.176.100] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 212 ms 189 ms 97 ms 172.18.44.14 2 127 ms 86 ms 659 ms 172.18.48.2 3 84 ms 106 ms 112 ms 203.92.154.60...
- The Need To Shout It Out Update: The state of 4G [Ars Technica] As a marketer, as an advertiser of a product or service, often times we have to shout out half-truths to sell our product. It is a fact. We do it seemingly quite often...
- Which telco are you using? **Singapore tests update at the bottom of page** ** more Detailed analysis after the break ** Went to cell on Friday night. Did a poll and found out there were quite a number of DiGi supporters. With their amazing deals...
- P1 Wimax Malaysia | 4G built in! 16 Aug 2010 update: http://www.goinglte.com/4g-it%E2%80%99s-all-semantics-1606/ First off, a short introduction. When 3G came out, it operated at a theoretical “max” of 384kbit/sec. That’s barely enough for a steady YouTube stream. And even then, most early service providers were not able...
Comments are closed.
I AM ONE OF THOSE SUCKERS WHO GOT CONNED BY P1WIMAX…. DONT BELIEVE P1WIMAX!!!
THEIR CONNECTION SUCKS BIG TIME!!! WORST THAN STREAMYX
THEIR CUSTOMER SERVICE ALSO SUCKS BIG TIME!!! WORST THAN STREAMYX
SO EVERYBODY… DON’T POTONG!!! ELSE U REGRET!!!
JUST BEAR WITH YOUR STREAMYX… AT LEAST BETTER THEN THE FCUKING P1WIMAX!!!